ABANDONDED THEATER: TJ's Top 20 Films of 2012 (10-1)

First check out my Honorable Mentions list and the lower half of my Top 20!

All caught up?  Awesome. Let's continue.

10. Holy Motors

Holy Motors is one of the most bizarre films I have ever seen. This French art film left me with a complicated feeling of bewilderment and of excitement. Months later, its scenes are still firmly planted in my memory. The accordion interlude, Kylie Minogue’s musical number, the special effects aliens having sex, the strange sewer “leprechaun,” the talking limousines, the driver’s mask, and the infinite ability that actor Denis Lavant has to contort his body into different roles. Everything in this film feels forced, but in the best possible way. It feels passionate, and runs off the rails constantly, which is a thrilling thing to watch.

Film is an ever evolving art medium that gains and loses fans every day. Nearly everyone knows the feeling of going to the movies, but most people don’t view the cinema as church. Leos Carax appears to, given the film’s lofty ambitions and striking religious imagery. (The Madonna taming the beast, the enthralled congregation at the beginning of the film during a film-within-the-film. The title: Holy Motors. The last word: “Amen.”) And it feels true to life. Tragic, hilarious, violent, irreverent, reverent, and never boring, Holy Motors accomplishes the impossible. It makes you think and feel deeply, instead of just laugh and cry, which is paraphrased from something Ang Lee once said of Ingmr Bergman’s films. This quote sticks with me, and is entirely appropriate to Holy Motors.

My review is here.

9. Skyfall

Academy Award-winning Director Sam Mendes’ work (American Beauty, Road to Perdition) on James Bond 23, titled Skyfall, is an unparalleled entry into the series. It is also the best action movie of the past few years, combining impressively badass set-pieces with beautiful and thoughtful cinematography (by the great Roger Deakins). Mendes leads a team of talented filmmakers and actors to make pound-for-pound the most gorgeous action movie I’ve ever seen. Each scene is shot with care, whether it is M (Judi Dench) looking over the coffins of fallen MI6 agents/workers, or it is Bond fighting an assassin in a Shanghai high-rise, or it is the manic Silva (Javier Barden) having his face darkened by the night but lit up with an razed inferno of Bond’s childhood home. This team of filmmakers doesn’t pull any punches and never ironically tackles their action-movie/spy-movie material. They don’t have to do any such thing, because there is plenty of artistry to be had in a big budget film. Christopher Nolan proved this with his Dark Knight franchise. Mendes references Nolan’s films often, but he never plagiarizes. He takes parts of Nolan’s vision of a genre film and translates it into his own aesthetic.

Everything about this film is fresh, yet revelatory. After leaving the theater, I felt as if this movie needed to exist to restore a dwindling franchise. And I felt that way when I saw it a second time, a third. Daniel Craig might be at this game for a long time as Bond, and I’m perfectly all right with that. He’s adding a necessary amount of grit to the 21^st-Century Bond. Maybe one day it will be necessary to camp things up again, like they were in the 70s, 80s, 90s, for the sake of variety, but as of this moment, the trajectory of a 50 year old franchise has never looked better.

My review is here. 

8. Beasts of the Southern Wild

In Benh Zeitlin’s Beasts of the Southern Wild, quiet introspection goes hand-in-hand with childlike energy. The heroine, the 5 year old Hushpuppy, played gloriously by Quvenzhane Wallis, swallows the film whole in her performance, aided by the patronly direction by Zeitlin. The perfect collaboration, between actor (albeit a young inexperienced firecracker like Wallis) and a director (who is also fairly inexperienced). Her every nuance, depicted by a then-five-year-old girl, is captured by Zeitlin and his crew, which is a testament to filmmaking’s power. Their world, the small island south of New Orleans, called The Bathtub, pays homage to auteurs like Terrence Malick in its attention to nature, but it is also Zeitlin’s own creation. Scratch that. Really, Zeitlin is the anti-auteur. He allows the world to speak for itself, without imposing any of his own views into it. While a vocal minority has dismissed this film as a condescending, racist depiction of a black family in the bayou (poor, uneducated, violent father, missing parents, all told by a young, inexperienced white writer-director) I found it honest and true to the environment. While the story is a fable, depicting a completely unrealistic but completely true world that could never exist in the real world, but certainly exists on camera, it maintains a certain amount of honesty about the impoverished areas struck by Hurricane Katrina.

What Beasts of the Southern Wild is ultimately about is survival and honesty to one’s chosen life path. Hushpuppy and her father live honesty, in their own way, by their own standards, and they are folk heroes for doing as much. 

7. Cloud Atlas

David and Lana Wachowski have had an uneven career in their filmography. With the first Matrix film, they were met with acclaim, but every film that has succeeded that undeniable science-fiction game changer did not find the same critical (or even, at times, financial) adoration. Now with Cloud Atlas, they have their most divisive film yet, with even TIME magazine calling it the worst of the year. But they couldn’t be more wrong, because the Wachowskis, working with a third director, the talented Tom Tykwer of Run Lola Run fame, made their best film yet.  It is based off an even more impressive novel that intertwines six seemingly unrelated stories into one epic about the theme of inter-connectedness. The beauty of the whole film is that, for all of its ambitions and extremism, it never has that clichéd moment where “everything makes sense.” Instead, it trusts the audience to make the connections between the stories, some subtle, some obvious. And many people did not make the connections. And many people hated this film.

Many films this year dealt with philosophy and faith, from The Grey to Life of Pi, but Cloud Atlas dealt with it in a very unique way. Its claim is that we all affect one another, and the greatest achievement one can accomplish is a good deed. All religious indoctrination aside, the truest form of goodness does not come from piety, but from general empathy. The villains lack empathy, and the heroes contain extraordinary amounts of it. Mixing tales of nineteenth-century slavery, early twentieth-century European composers, cheesy 1970s spy thrillers, modern British farces, futuristic dystopic sci-fi adventures, and distant future post-apocalyptic adventure tales, Cloud Atlas is a film like no other and a journey I will take over and over again through my movie-viewing life. And while many people use the nasty and lazy insult “pretentious,” I reply by saying that a word like pretentious is used by the dumb to bring the ambitious and intelligent down to their level. It is one thing to question a movie’s execution, but another to lob empty criticisms because one truly does not understand the themes of a piece. That is on the audience, not the three artists who made Cloud Atlas.

Many people hate this movie, and they have the right to, but they shouldn’t use lazy labels like “pretentious.”

*Gets off soapbox*

My review is here.

 6. Life of Pi

And then there is the best directed film of 2012. Ang Lee fascinatingly worked with a story that might have been even harder to put onto the screen than Cloud Atlas in Life of Pi. To turn a philosophical, allegorical coming-of-age story that takes place almost entirely on the open sea, in a life boat, with a live tiger, Ang Lee had his hands full. But he pulls it off beautifully. Pi is a fantastic character, fleshed out and empathetic. But Richard Parker, the tiger, is as interesting and strong of a character, and to make a realistic-looking CGI tiger that impressive of a “casting.” This isn’t a world where CGI creatures are replacing actors, but it is certainly a world where directors are more open-minded about how they make their films, and what they focus on.

Ang Lee has always been an ambitious filmmaker. He pushes himself, whether he makes a failed attempt at a comic book movie (Hulk), a true-to-life tale of suburbia (The Ice Storm), a flamboyant martial arts film (Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon) or a tragic love story (Brokeback Mountain). Lee exists as a storyteller who shows no limitations to the types of stories that fascinate him or the scope of the stories he will tell. Small, microscopic tales of two lovers or giant treatises on God and art are both game to Lee. In Life of Pi, that ambition, and ultimate pull off, left me impressed with Lee as a filmmaker and touched by the story he was presenting.

The final question of the wonderful film, if we choose to believe in God or not, extends into a bigger idea than mere religion, and into the ultimate reason why we exist and think and act the ways we do. The battle for our souls is not fought between the devil and God, but by our own cynicism and the promise of a better life. Sometimes we have to escape reality to find the truth, and in Life of Pi, that proves very true.

Are we the survivor who lived through a terrible atrocity, or are we the tiger?

My review is here.

5. Moonrise Kingdom

Wes Anderson may be an acquired taste, but what a wonderful acquired taste he is. He creates diorama-like films that amp up the quirk while dialing in the over-seriousness. Peppered with the sort of sentiment that you have in your grandmother’s crocheted quilt, there is something altogether lovely about Anderson’s worlds. Whether Rushmore or A Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou, he has created worlds that exist on its own terms. Like a fan of Marvel comics, fans of Wes Anderson’s films eat up their aesthetic with stocking caps and scarves.

Count me as a fan.

With Moonrise Kingdom, Anderson has made his best film yet. After a highly inventive, Benjamin Britten referencing opening credits sequence, I was in awe of the craftsmanship that went behind the making of his world. Taking place on a small New England island, Moonrise Kingdom follows the hero, a Khaki Scout named Sam (Jared Gilman) who defects to be with the love of his life, the young Suzy (Kara Hayward). With a supporting cast featuring the scout leader (Edward Norton), the local police captain (Bruce Willis), two lawyers who play Suzy’s parents (Bill Murray and Frances McDormand), a villainess aptly named Social Services (Tilda Swinton), a fun cameo by another scout leader and all-around rapscallion (Jason Schwartzman), and of course the narrator (Bob Balaban). Not a false note lands through the love story between Sam and Suzy, as they run around the island to escape all scouts, police, and parents to be with one another. Alexandre Desplat’s lovely score, aided by a selection of great previously recorded songs, orchestral and country-western, is the MVP in creating the wonderfully produced world of Anderson’s New Penzance. And that is where the strength of the film lies; it is as unrealistic as The Avengers (and there are probably a lot of comparisons between Wes Anderson and Joss Whedon), but Moonrise Kingdom feels more true in spite of it all.  I could watch this film over and over again, and never grow tired of it.

I might just do that right now. . .

My review is a part of this mass review post here. 

4. Zero Dark Thirty

Much ado has been made of Kathryn Bigelow’s masterpiece, Zero Dark Thirty. Both a journalistic take on the assassination of Osama Bin Laden and a feminist manifesto, intertwined perfectly, Zero Dark Thirty offers the world an intense vision of the world we live in,  and of which we understand so little. This earth is filled with violence and antagonism, and the groups of people at war are less defined than ever, and everyone wants to demean everyone else in the midst of it. The United States is not in war to aid its allies against an evil force, like they did with Hitler and the Nazis in the early 20^th century, where our heroes returned heroes. Instead cells of terrorists scarred the United States, brainwashed its own members, and hide in the night as we look and aim to kill for the sake of vengeance. We (Americans) rightly question our purpose in such a war against the terrorists. Zero Dark Thirty asks questions, directed at our hearts and minds, as to what limits we take our revenge. Torture? Assassination of Osama Bin Laden? 

The World Trade Center attacks affected everyone in a different way. Some have obsessed about the idea of getting back at the enemy. The protagonist of Zero Dark Thirty, Maya, played gloriously by the incredibly talented Jessica Chastain (The Tree of Life, The Help, Take Shelter, Mama, The Debt) is a hero defined by her work, engrossed in what she does, never stopping to smell the roses or explain to the audience how she has to burst through the glass ceiling in the CIA or how she misses anyone from her pre-CIA life. She is defined by her actions, the ultimate journalistic protagonist. She carries the movie from its infant stages of Bush-era torture to the final, half-hour long raid. She reminds everyone throughout that she was the “motherfucker who found this place, sir” and the men around her would be right to listen. She acts as the beacon of hard work that it took to get the murderer who killed thousands of Americans. And even as Seal Team Six lands in Bin Laden’s compound, and they assassinate him, the children living there cry and whimper, and the music played by Alexandre Desplat (Yes, who also did the music for the very different Moonrise Kingdom, and the kinda similar Argo) is completely ominous and not gung-ho. All because of Maya’s hard work.

It is impossible not to think about director Kathryn Bigelow in terms of Maya. She is an Academy Award-winning director who won for another military tale, the PTSD epic The Hurt Locker. With Zero Dark Thirty, she has faced an impressive amount of misplaced liberal outrage by those completely misinterpreting her film as some sort of right-wing propaganda. But it is ludicrous to define the movie by that pre-chosen interpretation. It is much smarter, much more powerful, much more unsettling than any limiting view that those attacking Zero Dark Thirty have described it. It is the sort of movie that requires introspection, questioning, and passionate feelings. Maybe in the end the controversy is exactly the way we should feel about this powerful movie. But to limit it to something so off-base and basic is a criticism-crime.

Zero Dark Thirty is one of four films deserving “Best Picture of the Year” status, with the rest of my Top 4. It is important. It is vital. It is woman.

My review is here. 

3. Amour

Michael Haneke is one of the 21st century’s most important directors. With Amour, Haneke might have made his best film. There are arguments for Cache, and especially for The White Ribbon, but Amour sticks even more than those fantastic, important French and Austrian films. The story in Amour this: two upper-class, liberal, artistic French octogenarians who are in love, living in the twilight of their lives are met with a tragedy. The wife, Anne Laurent (played by deserved Best Actress nominee at Sunday night’s impending Oscars, Emmanuelle Riva) has a stroke and her husband, Georges (played as well by French acting legend Jean-Louis Trintignant), must take care of her. The entire film encompasses his love, pain, and passion for his wife. The movie lacks the American sentimentality, and addresses love in completely observational terms, but it still impacts the audience in a completely devastating manner. The most emotionally draining (and well-earned) film of the year, Amour is made by an older filmmaker, featuring older actors, everything feels authentic. Even as the movie becomes more ambiguous at the end of the film, featuring hallucinations and a pigeon of death, it never ceases to feel real. With Georges feeding his wife, sitting next to his wife, changing, yes, his wife’s diaper, due to the severity of her stroke(s), there isn’t a moment where I wasn’t like “Jesus. . .”

Haneke, nominated for Best Director (over more popular filmmakers like Ben Affleck and Kathryn Bigelow), Best Original Screenplay, Best Foreign Film, and even Best Picture at this year’s Oscars, has created a movie that speaks to the Academy, whose members’ age is averaged at 72. This is an important movie for the world’s elderly, but the themes of love and fear of death extend to universal appeal. While not everyone you know, especially the squeamish, will not be able to finish this film, not one person in the world could deny its power. Art is powerful, and more filmmakers should take on subject matters this difficult.

2. Django Unchained

Speaking of a difficult subject matter: American slavery!

The “other” and probably “better” huge meta-movie of 2012, after the in-of-itself impressive Seven Psychopaths and The Cabin in the Woods, Quentin Tarantino’s Django Unchained is everything you want in a Tarantino film, and at times even more. A spiritual sibling to Inglourious Basterds, and as good, Django Unchained is the sort of ludicrous Tarantino movie that hits all the rights spots in comedy (and absolutely hilarious comedy), horrors (not horror), violence (as campy as it is), and even drama. The drama is led by Jamie Foxx, in his best role, playing alongside Christoph Waltz, in his best role, Leonardo DiCaprio, in his best role, and Samuel L. Jackson, in his best role. These four actors perfectly deliver Tarantino’s unique brand of dialogue, through a spaghetti western that finds a way to never demean the memory of those who suffered back during slavery. He sets his story through the standard hero arch, with a protégé of an established figure (Django played by Foxx, protégé to Dr. Schultz played by Waltz) and has to overcome all adversity to accomplish his task (saving his wife played by Kerry Washington from the villains played by DiCaprio and Jackson), which becomes seemingly impossible after he loses his mentor.

You see, Tarantino’s revenge tales (Inglourious Basterds, Kill Bill) feature seemingly exploitative storylines of wronged people—whether Holocaust-era Jews or women who have gone through violence at the hands of men—who overcome all odds and win the day over those who have wronged them—whether Nazis or abusive spouses. Tarantino sets up Django Unchained to be about how the “great white hope” saves the slave, but in reality, Django saves himself, through his own ability and passion, which says something about slaves that no other Hollywood filmmaker has the balls to say. Tarantino is saying, “These people can take care of themselves.” This is not The Help, retold with its pretty bow, but instead a messy story of a black man freeing himself.  

My review is here.

1. The Master

What more can I say about the best film of 2012? I’ve championed it since I saw it in September. Paul Thomas Anderson’s latest masterpiece is one of the most elusive, ambiguous, difficult, and vital films of the year because of the extremely powerful craftsmanship he uses and the collaborative effort of his cast and crew. Joaquin Phoenix, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Amy Adams, Mihai Malaimare, Jr., Jonny Greenwood, David Crank & Jack Fisk, and everyone else who worked on The Master deserve credit for the amazing aspects they added to the film. It is too bad that this film isn’t entirely recognized for its importance, but I guess that is what time is for—to create importance. Just ask 2001: A Space Odyssey, Citizen Kane, and Vertigo.

                                     

What does all this work add up to, though? The film observes 1950s America through the lens of a PTSD suffering (and crazy) man in Freddie Quell (Phoenix), the weird sort of faith healing and Scientology infant stage of the time in The Master himself, Lancaster Dodd (Philip Seymour Hoffman), and the role of a 50s wife, the Lady MacBeth-esque Peggy Dodd (Amy Adams).  Each character is intensely put to screen by their respective actor. There is not a more subtle performance this year than by Amy Adams. There is not a more charismatic performance than Philip Seymour Hoffman, save possible by Christoph Waltz in Django. Both performances are equally amazing, though, in that they put the characters before the actors’ ego. But when has Hoffman ever put his ego before his character? Here, he may have a career best, rivaled only by his turn as Capote. He is not a satirized figure, nor a stereotype. He is as nuanced as the rest of the cast, to Paul Thomas Anderson and his own credit. I put Waltz as my Supporting Actor of the year in my previous list, but in reality, Hoffman is just as fantastic. And finally there is Joaquin Phoenix as the scoundrel Freddie Quell. Can anyone claim as powerful of a performance this year? The answer is no. Phoenix gives a career best turn as the most lasting character of the year. No man has stuck with me as long as Quell. He is a force, unrelenting in who or what he damages, having a twisted life before the Master, and subtly (believe it or not) altered after he meets the Master. Every crevice in his face is created by the actor himself as he contorts his face into a stranger’s appearance. His walk is different. The way he talks. Even more impressive than Daniel Day Lewis as Abraham Lincoln, Joaquin Phoenix transforms into his character, never questioned, and always observed by us. While we don’t like him, per se, we can’t help but be fascinated by him. And when someone gives a brave performance like this, so soon after a highly publicized meltdown of his own, it deserves the attention.

I could go on, and on, but I already did in my complete thoughts here.  Let me just let it alone with these parting thoughts. What is the point of art? Is it merely to entertain? Or is there a bigger goal? The answer is obvious, you pick for yourself. You get to buy your movie ticket. I have chosen to use this space, Abandoned Theater, at this blog Your Personal Opinion Is Wrong to champion what I value most, and that is ambition and complete immersion into a world created by teams of filmmakers that are attempting to elevate human art to the very heights of imaginations limitations. I enjoy genre, and I enjoy high art, and really, I enjoy them equally. As long as the filmmaker does one thing: he or she is true. He or she takes chances. And he or she doesn’t fall into the pitfalls of negotiating their art for dollar signs.

There is a reason why I think Paul Thomas Anderson is the best filmmaker of his generation. He checks all the boxes.

Cheers.

read more "ABANDONDED THEATER: TJ's Top 20 Films of 2012 (10-1)"

ABANDONED THEATER: Danny's Top 20 Films of 2012

Hello, everyone! I am taking a break from my usual music-related writings to step in on YPOIW's Abandoned Theater segment, which, as the title suggests, focuses on films. This is a list of my top twenty favorite films of 2012 along with very brief blurbs for the top ten. Thanks for reading!

- Danny Spiteri

20. Jeff, Who Lives at Home




19. The Secret World of Arrietty



18. The Dark Knight Rises



17. Django Unchained



16. Bernie



15. Argo



14. Silver Linings Playbook



13. This is 40



12. Amour



11. Wreck-it Ralph



10. Paranorman



The makers of 2009's exceptional Coraline return with Paranorman, a well-intentioned depiction of misunderstood children that also serves as an immaculately animated and genuinely humorous film for all ages.

9. Skyfall



Sam Mendes brings a fresh voice to the admirably durable James Bond franchise, employing magnificent cinematography and top-notch contributions from actors both fresh and familiar to the series to create what is by far one of the best Bond films to date.

8. Cloud Atlas



Although it doesn't execute its thematically dense plot quite as coherently as it could, Cloud Atlas is nevertheless an enthralling, memorable film that mostly realizes its ambition.

7. Looper



Looper is a stylish tech-noir film that succeeds both as a thrilling action movie with an engaging plot and exciting sequences and as a demonstration of how desire can eventually corrupt a person.

6. The Perks of Being a Wallflower



From a distance, The Perks of Being a Wallflower could seem like a generic entry in the indie teen movie genre, but rather, the film transcends its clichés with irresistibly charming performances and emotionally resonant themes.

5. Seven Psychopaths



Martin McDonagh's followup to 2008's In Bruges is a witty piece of satire that smartly makes commentary on Hollywood films, also utilizing its all-star cast to great comedic effect.

4. Beasts of the Southern Wild



An aesthetically beautiful, exceptionally paced coming-of-age story, Beasts of the Southern Wild is not only a promising debut from director Benh Zeitlin, but also an excellent showcase for young lead actress Quvenzhané Wallis' stunning performance.

3. Holy Motors



Parallels between "the stage" and "real life" have been drawn before, but Holy Motors expresses them via a highly surreal and bizarre lens, comparing the cinema to reality in a thought-provoking and surprisingly relatable fashion.

2. The Master



Never shortchanging its expertly developed characters, The Master is an intricate exploration of faith, loneliness, and the often confused search for fulfillment, featuring superb performances from Joaquin Phoenix, Philip Seymour Hoffman, and Amy Adams, as well as typically masterful direction from one of modern cinema's most respectable names, Paul Thomas Anderson.

1. Moonrise Kingdom



Wes Anderson has been fine-tuning his signature style of quirky indie film making over the course of his filmography, arriving at what is arguably his finest film yet with Moonrise Kingdom, a gorgeously framed, tastefully heartwarming, and appropriately funny tale of love between two outsider-esque children.

read more "ABANDONED THEATER: Danny's Top 20 Films of 2012"

ABANDONED THEATER: Robby's Top 20 Films of 2012: 10-1

(Abandoned Theater is the segment of YPOIW where TJ and others (but mostly TJ) discuss another one of our great passions: film. Today however Robby is going to chime in on a two-part series of his top 20 films of 2012. He already published the first half of his list here, here is the second part where we get to the nitty gritty: his top ten films of 2012.)

10. Amour

My experience with Michael Haneke is, truthfully, a rocky one. He's made films I've liked and films that honestly run the gamut of offending me. But Amour is more than a refreshing change for Haneke, in fact I think it's easily his most human film ever. The title is the French word for "love", and a Haneke film with that title seems almost destined to have been given the title ironically. But not here. Amour is an real, earnest depiction of love, and what love might truly mean in the end of it. Who would've thought a Haneke-directed film about a slow death would be more alive than most films are?

9. Goon

Goon is the type of comedy that I'd want to revisit at least once every few months. The fact is that this little film about a bouncer-turned-hockey enforcer with some of the most brutal fight scenes and some of the dirtiest one-liners last year also had one of the biggest hearts in a comedy that I've seen in a long time. Sean William Scott delivers a surprisingly mannered performance as the "goon", a lovable oaf with iron fists. There haven't been many great hockey movies since Slapshot I think, but Goon stands as a very worthy successor to that.

8. The Comedy

This has been one of the more divisive films of 2012, and it makes sense. There's no way in hell this was going to be an acclaimed piece of work. It has the divisiveness and offensiveness of a Harmony Korine film. But it also has the artfulness of something like that. Over the past few years "raunchy" R-rated comedies about 30-40 year old manchildren goofing around and avoiding responsibility have seen a rise in popularity; it was about time someone made a piece of work on how shallow and unfulfilling that lifestyle really is. This type of behavior is so exaggerated in The Comedy that it couldn't possibly be rationalized as being okay, and Tim Heidecker gives one of the best performances of 2012 as the poster child of that kind of destructive way of life. Is The Comedy a cautionary tale? Is it a portrait of a meaningless existence? Is it a bold generational statement? Check "all of the above".

7. The Avengers

Marvel has had an unreal stride of bringing quality and class back to superhero films, and they've ingeniously tied them together over the years to finally bring us The Avengers. An equally smart move was to put Joss Whedon in the director's chair, and his mastery of dialogue and characters is what brings this film to life. With a film so packed and in a sense with so little time with any one character, Whedon finds a way to let the audience get to know the character fully, to the point where even the smallest roles are memorable. A death of a character midway through the film, a character that could be considered somewhat disposable in earlier Marvel films, is so gripping and important partly because Whedon has taken such great care of every one of these characters. Let's hope more writers of superhero films take note.

6. Moonrise Kingdom

Like Michael Haneke's case in my #10 pick, I think Wes Anderson has made easily his must human film in Moonrise Kingdom, at least since Rushmore. In many of his films since then, I think the intensity in Anderson's art direction and finite details often took prevalence, with things like story and characters being built around them. In Moonrise however, Anderson presents a moving, and sometimes melancholy tale about the frustrations and burdens of childhood and adolescence. I haven't seen children depicted so realistically and bleakly since Spike Jonze's Where the Wild Things Are. Wes Anderson made a film about the troubles of this time, and a wish and hope to transcend the bitterness of adulthood, and it might prove to be his masterwork.

5. Jeff, Who Lives at Home

The Duplass Brothers are a unique voice in independent film, and I think this is their best project yet. This is the kind of indie that so inspires me and makes me optimistic about American independent cinema. This kind of film, to me, used to happen 3 to 4 times a year. Now it seems it only comes across once every other year. In fact I think the last time I was so inspired by a picture of this nature was Lisa Cholodenko's The Kids Are All Right. It's a film of such small scale, but beautifully captures large ideas of fate, and figuring out your place in this world. No matter where you are in your life, you're likely to find something to relate to in Jeff, Who Lives at Home.

4. Lincoln

I'm as much of a Spielberg skeptic as I think many people are, and I wouldn't have been surprised if Lincoln ended up being War Horse 2, tonally. Instead Spielberg made a brave film that is so political that Dreamworks wouldn't release it until after the election. Lincoln's greatest accomplishment is that it's a film that respects history and understands its relationship with the present world; perhaps in the same way that movies can be a reflection of the real and present world. Tony Kushner's script, which is the best of any 2012 film, reminds us that what we now see as self-evident political truths took a lot of hard fighting to achieve, and in many cases, came close to never happening at all. Lincoln is a film that can inspire you in the same spirit the real man inspired America.

3. Holy Motors

Here we have one of the most complex and complicated pieces on my list. But even if I don't understand everything about Holy Motors (and if you say you do, you're lying), it is one of the most enthralling and inspiring viewing experiences I had in 2012. It is one of those special films where it feels like you're participating directly in the action, even in just figuring the damn thing out. It's certainly comprehensible though, Holy Motors ends up dealing in universal themes relating to identity and feeling a lack of connectedness in a big world. Leos Carax creates not just one, but multiple universes coinciding with one another, and Denis Lavant gives without qualification the performance of 2012. His agility and virtuosity in the craft of acting is nothing less than awe-inspiring. After watching this the first time, I wondered how it was going to fit in my 2012, and if it even could; now I cannot imagine my 2012 without it.

2. Beasts of the Southern Wild

Beasts of the Southern Wild is a portrait of cinematic bliss. It's a film about a love for life despite the horrors and adversities of it. That a film so majestic and far reaching could be made at such a bare, grassroots level is beyond inspiring to me. Beasts is one of the most joyous cinematic experiences I've ever had.

1. The Cabin in the Woods

So, yeah. This is it. The Cabin in the Woods is certainly not a critic-like or particularly artsy pick for the best film of 2012, and some of y'all might be scratching your heads or rolling your eyes that I put this on top in place of some of the more acclaimed films of last year. To put it simply, I put The Cabin in the Woods in my top spot because I felt that I must. Horror is a genre that I grew up with, a genre I love and that I've unfortunately seen take a decline into the becoming some of the trashiest fodder of Hollywood studios. And to see a film that acknowledges and satirizes the formula would've been great, but instead Joss Whedon and Drew Goddard did something even better; they made a game-changer. That's a term that's thrown around far too liberally, but what makes Cabin a game changer is this: it calls for the game to be changed.

HONORABLE MENTIONS:
Oslo, August 31st
The Perks of Being a Wallflower
The Raid: Redemption
Shut Up and Play the Hits
Your Sister's Sister

(OTHER) BEST COMEDIES
21 Jump Street
For a Good Time, Call...
Pitch Perfect
Sleepwalk with Me
Ted

(Thanks alot for sitting through Robby's top 20 films of 2012! For more fun, be sure to follow him on Twitter @ClydeNut!)

read more "ABANDONED THEATER: Robby's Top 20 Films of 2012: 10-1"

Abandoned Theater: the state of film criticism and small blurbs on the big movies from the first half of 2012.

There is a movie critic[i] who has written a negative review of the impending blockbuster, The Dark Knight Rises. His review is poorly written, but those who dislike his review do not attack just his taste, or his writing, but his very life through the internet.

There are trolls[ii], who love to threaten the lives of critics, just to get a rise out of the world.

There is a blogger[iii] who has had too much to drink, and he decides to start rambling about his thoughts on why critics are disrespected. Rambling bloggers and critics are dangerous, because their logic starts to fray, and their well-earned authority dissipates. You notice the holes in their logic and you recognize the innate flaws in any opinion writer’s philosophy.

You have all of the power over this writer, this glorified “thinker.” You have it all.

My thoughts, as the drunken critic:

What the hell is the point of film criticism? Scratch that—the point is obvious. Film critics use their trained eyes to point viewers towards good movies and warn them about bad movies. Film critics help create an interwoven conversation about where film has come from and where it is going. Film critics jumpstart careers of young, creative filmmakers[iv]  while making sure we shun the works of the filmmakers that have gone stale creatively[v]. Sometimes critics harbor unpopular opinions, even against popular movies, and they get flamed for their minority views. Sometimes fans ignore the critics, and go and see Ice Age 4 or Transformers 2 regardless of what the critics say. People enjoy these popular films, regardless of whether they’re panned or not. But critics continue to exist and get paid their mostly meager salaries[vi].

Why do critics exist? So many of my friends and loved ones hate critics and claim they're snobby and out of touch. But with whom are they out of touch?  ‘Regular’ people? Well, don’t ‘regular’ people ask for quality entertainment? I know they do. The problem is what constitutes as quality to different people. As a subjective aspect of perception in regards to arts and entertainment, quality is oftentimes argued about with no common ground in sight. Two respected film critics can argue over two movies in circles, and never come to a conclusion. Easily, my favorite film of 2011 was Terrence Malick’s The Tree of Life. A lot of critics hated it. A lot of non-critics hated it too. Plenty of people did like it, though[vii], including myself.

Critics have to realize that opinions will vary. If I don’t like Harry Potter and the Half-Blooded Prince like my friend does, and my friend sheds tears at the death of (SPOILER) Dumbledore every time he watched the movie, who am I to say that the movie that brought them to tears is bad. If my friend is really digging the new album by Chromatics, or Tyler the Creator, or Owl City, so much so that they play that CD every day of their lives and still gain some sort of satisfaction from it, who am I to tell them that their CD is bloated and contains unimaginative songs.

 The last movies to make my heart flutter with excitement, nearly to the point of tears, were Moonrise Kingdom (we’re getting there) and City of God. These movies were beautifully shot, and so rich in their worlds’ textures that they spurred a sort of awe in me that I don’t feel often. In City of God, when Benny dies, I felt truly sad for his character’s fate. I know plenty of people who would have laughed at me for feeling strongly for that playboy character. But what am I to say to someone unaffected by City of God’s characterization and narrative structure?

In short, I guess there are no right answers and criticism is pointless, because no one is going to feel exactly how you feel anyway. Give up. Your mom is never going to get the ambiguous genius of Mulholland Drive and your dad will never realize that Dune is shit. Also, go cry yourself to sleep, because the Academy disagrees and The King Speech is better than The Social Network, no matter how strongly you may feel otherwise. It is all stupid and pointless. . .

The reader protests. You protest. You know that this is ludicrous. You know why you look up reviews, whether they are music reviews published by Pitchfork or Roger Ebert’s thoughts on movies. You know why you come here to Your Personal Opinion Is Wrong or you watch Anthony Fantano’s Youtube channel. You want to hear what other people are saying about your media. You want to see what conversations are taking place. If you know that a record is panned hard by some media outlet, you might want to listen to it anyway, just to see what the fuss is about. Or if you see that a lot of people felt that Bill Murray was robbed when he was up for Lost in Translation, you might want to add your .02 cents. Criticism is a community, and while Roger Ebert is a professional with training and many years of film history in mind when he writes his reviews, there are many tiers of critics, including this blogger you’re reading right now, writing your thoughts to paper. . .

Disagreement is good, though. It creates debate. If my brother loves The Book of Eli and if I think it was one of the worst movies I had seen in a while, we can spark healthy debate. If my sister really digs Mumford and Song but I think they’re hacks, we can hash it out. That is the way movies are remembered, by how you talked about them with others. Communication is the key to everything, as you know, and is why bloggers exist in the first place. Bloggers exist to talk about what they know, and what they are interested in, so readers can read and learn and start conversations. Critics exist to talk about art, so you can go out and formulate your own opinions. We both know that ‘regular’ people can formulate opinions using logic and reason, right? 

Here are some short reviews of the 2012 movies I have seen. They are mostly blockbusters, but most of the art films and great dramas will be coming out late in the year. So please, feel free to debate these movies, and talk about pros and cons. Because, isn’t that why we’re both here, at this moment, communicating?

+

John Carter -  3 / 5

This movie came out many moons ago, and all of the talk about its quality was overshadowed by how poorly it performed at the box office. It did perform poorly at the box office, and Disney’s advertising team deserves a lot of grief for the terrible job they did. But the film itself is not as bad as the trailers said it would be. I’d say that John Carter, based off Edgar Rice Burroughs’s science fiction novel Princess of Mars, does a passable job of retaining the original novel’s energy, but fails to transfer the excitement of the pages into a well-paced action-adventure movie. John Carter doesn’t attempt to be the next art-house hit, but it doesn’t quite hit all the right marks at being an awesome sci-fi adventure, either.

Firstly, the pacing is terrible. All of the action scenes are nearly forgettable and even the best set piece, where John Carter fights the White Apes, is short to the point of easy to miss during a pee break. The tension is not there for the characters, and you don’t really care for anyone the viewer should when an action star is in peril on screen. Other movies were more successful this year at making the viewer care about the characters as more than just stock heroes.

The special effects are well done, though maybe too over the top, and the film contains a degree of heart, where you can tell director Andrew Stanton (WALL-E) and screen writer Michael Chabon (The Adventures of Kavalier and Clay) care about the source material. You can see this heart in some of the interplay between characters, and whenever they deliver their more flat lines, you will hope for more of the “fun” moments. My guess is that, in the end, Disney decided to take creative control over the film and suck the life out of where Stanton and co. wanted to take it. It had a very corporate feel to it, even if the heart was barely visible beneath the surface.  This film is worth renting or catching on TV, for sure, though, if you want an easy and at times fun adventure.

+

The Hunger Games -  3.5 / 5

I have never read the books, and I found this movie entertaining. Its cast is great, especially its star Jennifer Lawrence. The movie clips at a fast pace, even given its 2+ hour runtime. I have heard a lot of complaints that the movie is not as good as the book, but being an outsider to the phenomenon that is The Hunger Games, none of the plot differences bothered me. The only faults in this film would be its lackluster special effects and its pacing in some spots. Its ambitions are clear from the beginning of the movie, and while it doesn’t reach every height it promises it will, but it is merely the first movie in a trilogy.

The Hunger Games is not perfect, and it isn’t even the best blockbuster of the year, but the movie far surpasses many of its other teen-book-turned-movie brethren, especially when compared to the Twilight films. The movie knows it is based off a young adult novel, and it is aimed towards teenagers, but it never forgets that writers and filmmakers owe debts to their characters. The Harry Potter films rarely forgot this and the films in that series worked because of that fact. The exciting Hunger Games series will likely head in the same direction, if they remember what they did well in this installment.

+

The Cabin in the Woods -  4.5 / 5

The Cabin in the Woods is a fun romp through the modern history of horror movies, satirizing torture porn and even what the creators of this film love about the genre of horror. When Drew Goddard (Cloverfield) and Joss Whedon (Serenity and Firefly, Buffy the Vampire Slayer) are involved in the writing, you have to expect meta-references and self-referential humor. This is Whedon’s writing at its best, showing that the man has not gone rusty while working on his other projects.

If Scary Movie wasn’t so terrible and unclever it might have been this good. If Scream took the next step into meta-horror-comedy, it might have been this good, and the first Scream is a good movie, on its own right, but it doesn’t touch The Cabin in the Woods in terms of ambition and fun. This movie succeeds because it catches the viewer so off guard, taking it self so (jokingly) seriously in the get go as your stereotypical horror movie, and then jumping off the rails as it quickly takes a left turn, leading its viewers down an insane adventure that no one would not expect without someone spoiling it for before they first see it.

And before I give anything else away, just trust me and go see this movie. It is smart, funny, horrific, and infinitely surprising.

+

The Avengers - 4.5 / 5

Oh, Joss Whedon. You not only had one awesome movie this year, but a second. The Avengers outshines every Marvel movie that came before it, and with nearly any other director, it would have been a complete disaster. The culmination of many movies via marketing scheme by Marvel, The Avengers should have failed! The movies that came before were a mixed bag. Iron Man was awesome and fun with a strong lead in Robert Downey, Jr. Captain America: The First Avenger was surprising in its references to old pulp comics and I left thoroughly pleased with spending my money. The rest were average action movies that didn’t leave an impression on me either way: Thor, The Incredible Hulk, and Iron Man 2. They each had some nice moments, but the sloppy writing and only “OK” acting at best, left the movies stale in the wake of the first Iron Man. And now, Whedon’s The Avengers manages to surpass Iron Man in nearly every way.

Whedon succeeds because he understands how to combine these different science fiction, comic superhero, and Norse god myths into a coherent plot, and he recognizes that it is all a bit ridiculous.  He inserts his own self-referential jokes throughout his screen play, making it a fun adventure. Downey Jr., Chris Hemsworth, Mark Ruffalo, and co. do a great job with their lines, creating a cast of memorable and 3D characters that we care about. When some are hurt, or worse, we grow sad. And we want the good guys to win. When they do, you leave the theater with a sense of accomplishment.

That is what good genre movie-making is about.

+

Prometheus - 4 / 5

And now for something completely different. Ridley Scott’s beautifully shot Alien prequel is an ambitious science fiction movie that earns its genre-tag. It is a true science fiction movie that questions technology and man’s scientific aspirations. It constantly questions, a true trope of the genre, even though it never finds one single answer. Prometheus is the anti-John Carter, with an advertising team that actually oversold the movie. In the end, though, the movie does more right than it does wrong, but its flaws keep it from being the masterpiece it could have been under a more coherent direction and writing.  

Damon Lindelof, one of the creators of Lost, is one of the screenwriters for this film and his work on Lost is actually a good starting point for Prometheus’s direction, because Prometheus is a lot more Lost than it is Alien. That is both good and bad. Lost is a fine, but flawed, television show that succeeds as often as it failed. Prometheus is much the same. But sometimes, intensely flawed movies and shows are memorable for the debate they create. Also, they are memorable because in many ways, they are truly good.

Prometheus struggles with pacing in its 3^rd act, and many of its characters are pointless-to-the-point-of-being-called-stock. The motives of nearly everyone in the cast is shrouded in mystery, none of which ever become clear, even after hours of scrutiny and pondering. The strengths of the movie lie in its acting from Michael Fassbender, Noomi Rapace, and the underrated Idris Elba. Fassbender may even earn an Oscar nomination playing the android that constantly drives the plot forward.

In the end, this movie will garner haters, but it will remain one of the memorable films of 2012 regardless of their legitimate concerns. 

+

Brave - 4/ 5

Is Brave the best Pixar movie? Absolutely not. It actually ranks quite low in their filmography. But it is still a great family film that is beautiful, fun, and heartfelt. Also, it contains some interesting psychological ideas about daughters and their mothers. Acting as their only film about mother-daughter relationships, Brave is unique when compared to the rest of the Pixar movies. 

But all Pixar movies bring adult themes to the table: moving on to the next part of life (Toy Story 3), growing old (The Incredibles), homosexuality (Monsters Inc). Ok, I was kidding about that last one, but each Pixar movie contains ideas past GOOD GUY MUST BEAT BAD GUY or GUY LOVES GIRL. Brave continues this thread, and it does it well, making it a worthwhile movie for both adults and kids.

It won’t be a crowd pleaser with the kids as much as Cars 1 or 2, but it will resonate more equally among the age brackets than those movies, for certain. With its humor, its adventure, and its great animation, Brave will be a contender for Best Animated Feature at the Oscars.

+

The Amazing Spider-Man – 3.5/ 5

First, why does this movie exist?  Well, for one, Andrew Garfield is a better Spider-Man than Tobey Maguire. And Emma Stone is a better love interest than Kirsten Dunst. The acting from the two leads (and Martin Sheen as Uncle Ben) is far superior to the Sam Raimi trilogy of Spider-Man films.

But do we need another Spider-Man reboot?

The answer in the end is “Sure, why not.” This is a solid movie which doesn’t reach the heights of Spider-Man 2, but beats the original and the 3^rd installment handily. Taking out a lot of the schlocky humor for witty humor and improving the special effects (and using more stunt work), Marc Webb has done a good job directing a good movie here in The Amazing Spider-Man. Where the film falls flat is where John Carter did in terms of the production team meddling too much and cutting out much of the film (almost anything involving Peter Parker’s parents). Why do this, to spread out the story to as many sequels as possible and make more money.

That isn’t to fault the fun of this movie and the work Andrew Garfield and Marc Webb did to make it enjoyable

+

Moonrise Kingdom - 5 / 5

And now the granddaddy of 2012’s first half: Moonrise Kingdom. Wes Anderson has directed many quirky indie movies, creating a name for himself in the film festival bracket, with his legions of adoring fans, and with critics. In his great films, he pushes his own aesthetic to new bounds from where he has taken it before. Because he focuses and pushes Moonrise Kingdom so far, he has made his best movie yet, and the best movie I’ve seen of 2012[viii].

The open credit sequence is the part of the movie that almost brought a tear to my eye, instilling me with such awe and wonder and intense emotion at its craft, putting me into the mindset for the rest of the film that I was witnessing a spectacle. The camera is shifting between the different rooms of this house, and the children play and write letters, never mundanely, creating a world out of a moving camera and a well-built set. Anderson has worked with this effect before, but as with everything else in the movie, this is Anderson doing Anderson, but better.

Wes Anderson has rarely put this much emotion into me as he did with that opening sequence, since most of his characters are detached from reality. But here, the characters, still speaking in their start-stop borderline emotionless, find a way to live and breathe in their world more completely than ever. Anderson’s characters, played by talented kids and veteran actors like Bill Murray, Tilda Swinton, Bruce Willis, Edward Norton, ect, are fictional people who talk almost like normal people, but feel emotion as beautifully as normal people. Jason Schwartzman steals the show with his cameo, and creates one of the funniest scenes in Anderson’s career, a wedding between two kids with Schwartzman playing the pastor.

This movie will hopefully be Anderson’s Midnight in Paris, garnering him the respect from the Academy next winter when the Oscars come around. He has the respect of the critics, and Hollywood, and his fans, but he deserves to have some immortality given his work throughout the past decade. Anderson has been building up to this movie, and I cannot recommend this movie enough. To anyone. To everyone.

---

[i] Like here.

[ii]  Or here.

[iii] Me, of course.  

[iv] Joel and Ethan Coen, Blood Simple; Paul Thomas Anderson, Hard Eight; Fernando Meirelles, City of God.

[v] M. Night Shyamalan and Michael Bay are quite notorious.

[vi]  Sometimes critics, or bloggers more like, are paid no salaries. A lot of people do this on their free time, like *cough* yours truly. We just love writing I guess. Rarely, critics are quite wealthy, but that only happens if you’re Roger Ebert and you’ve published best-selling books.

[vii] Read my review here.

[viii] We’ll see if The Dark Knight Rises or Beasts of the Southern Wild knock this off its pedestal by week’s end.

read more "Abandoned Theater: the state of film criticism and small blurbs on the big movies from the first half of 2012."